Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Height topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board reviews ordinance to clarify how building height and elevation are measured

2592025 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Feb. 4, 2025 meeting, the Melbourne Beach Planning and Zoning Board reviewed proposed revisions to local rules that define how to measure structure elevation and building height and how those measurements interact with existing height caps.

At its Feb. 4, 2025 meeting, the Melbourne Beach Planning and Zoning Board reviewed proposed revisions to local regulations that define how to measure a structure’s elevation and building height, and how those measurements cap roof heights on coastal lots.

The draft would set specific measurement points tied to the existing finished floor and the elevation above the crown of the road: if the finished floor is less than 18 inches above the crown of the road, a different measurement rule applies than when it is 18–36 inches; if the finished floor is already above 36 inches, the ordinance treats 36 inches as the starting measurement point. Board members discussed how those rules interact with a 28‑foot limit measured from the applicable grade and how stem walls or fill have in practice produced taller structures.

Board members and staff framed the changes as aimed at removing a construction method that had allowed homes to gain additional height (for example, by building stem walls or raising finished floors) and thereby exceed neighborhood height expectations. Staff explained that, under the proposed language, the 28‑foot cap would be applied from the defined starting elevation and that the ordinance would prevent builders from using stem walls and fill to effectively add more than the intended allowance. Members used local examples — lots on Third Avenue and B Street were cited — to illustrate how current grading and prior finished floors can produce different maximum roof heights under the present wording.

The board approved forwarding the draft to the town commission for its first reading next month. The board’s approval included an amendment requesting that the building official review and confirm that the draft text is harmonized with the town’s definition of building height in other code sections before the commission hearing. That approval was for the draft presentation only; adoption would occur at the commission’s readings if they take final action.

Next steps: the ordinance will appear to the town commission for first reading next month. The board’s action at this meeting was a vote to forward the draft and request the identified harmonization check; no final adoption occurred at this meeting.