Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Incentives Chapter 100 topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Economic Development Committee endorses current incentive policy after discussion of Chapter 100

2591340 · February 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Wildwood Economic Development Committee voted to endorse its existing economic incentive policy (Ordinance No. 2348) after a multi-member discussion about how Chapter 100 of Missouri law could be used to attract development. Committee members requested clarifications on stakeholder protections and noted potential effects on taxing districts.

The Wildwood Economic Development Committee on Tuesday endorsed the city’s existing economic incentive policy, as set out in Ordinance No. 2348, after a discussion about whether to call out Chapter 100 of Missouri law in the policy.

Committee Chair Ottenberg called for an endorsement of the current policy after staff presented background on the city’s procedures for public funding assistance. Mr. Lee, speaking for city economic development staff, summarized the policy and described Chapter 100 as a state statute that can provide sales-tax exemptions on construction purchases and a temporary property-tax abatement negotiated with taxing districts.

The endorsement motion passed by voice vote; committee members debated several details before voting. Council Member Jackson and others pressed staff for examples and timelines; Mr. Lee cited a recent Chapter 100 use in Ellisville and explained that abatement periods commonly run about 10 to 20 years but have been as short as five years in some cases. Council members asked whether Chapter 100 would reduce revenue to the school district, fire district or other taxing authorities; Mr. Lee said it could reduce “future proceeds” to those districts if the taxes otherwise would have increased with development and that the state statute requires notification and coordination with other taxing districts.

Several members said they were concerned about potential near-term revenue effects for the Rockwood School District and fire services, while others said a deferred revenue stream that would not exist without the development could be preferable to no development at all. Council Member McCutcheon and Council Member Dodwell both emphasized that developers would be required to seek input from affected taxing districts and that “letters of no contest” are typically used in the Chapter 100 process to document acceptance or non-opposition by those districts.

Mr. Lee told the committee the city’s current public funding assistance policy already references “other public financing options allowed under Missouri state statute” (section d) and therefore Chapter 100 is technically included; staff proposed that the council could simply call out Chapter 100 explicitly if the committee wanted to make that clearer.

After discussion, the committee voted to endorse the existing economic incentive policy as written and to remain open to adding specific Chapter 100 language in future revisions. The motion was carried by voice vote; committee minutes record the motion as approved without a roll-call tally.

The department said it will return to the council with any recommended edits if the committee or council asks staff to specifically enumerate Chapter 100 provisions in the city’s policy.