Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Write Ins topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Secretary of State backs registration process for write-in candidates to streamline results
Summary
The Secretary of State’s Office told the committee it supports creating a registration process for write-in candidates so clerks can identify valid write-in recipients and present clearer results; the office suggested three result categories: registered write-ins, other write-ins, and blanks.
Secretary of State staff told the House committee on March 12 they support the bill language establishing a registration process for write-in candidates and making the election-night reporting clearer for clerks and the public.
Elections Director Sean Sheehan said the change will create three categories in vote reporting: (1) registered write-ins (candidates who filed consent), (2) ‘‘other write-ins’’ aggregated when no consent is on file, and (3) blank votes. Sheehan said the approach reduces clerk workload and prevents a long list of fictitious or joke write‑ins from being presented as individual entries in the results.
The nut graf: by requiring write-in candidates to file a consent-to-serve form before being tallied as named write-ins, clerks can count valid write-in votes for actual consenting candidates while aggregating all other write-ins in an ‘‘other’’ category; that simplifies reporting without eliminating write-in access.
Sheehan and Hibbert asked for a small drafting tweak to the bill’s language to avoid implying that fictitious names should be counted as write-ins and to align statutory text with existing counting practice. Committee members asked procedural questions about how clerks will handle recounts and phone-based confirmations; staff said procedures would remain and clerks would continue to verify registered write-ins during canvass and certification.
Ending: The committee accepted the office’s rationale for a registration/consent process for write-in candidates and asked staff to reflect the drafting clarification in the updated bill language.
