Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate Transportation trims S.66, directs AOT to develop noise standards and enforcement plan

2581384 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Senate Transportation Committee reviewed S.66 on vehicle noise, agreed to remove several subjective or hard-to-enforce provisions, and directed the Agency of Transportation to draft objective noise standards, measurement procedures and a citizen-reporting process with a December 15 report date.

Senate Transportation reviewed S.66, a bill that would add statewide vehicle-noise rules, and agreed Thursday to pare back parts the committee found difficult to enforce while directing the Agency of Transportation (AOT) to recommend measurable standards and an enforcement process.

The move matters because Vermont currently lacks a statewide objective noise standard for motor vehicles; the committee heard testimony that the patchwork of municipal ordinances and existing inspection guidance leaves residents without a clear reporting or enforcement path.

Committee members focused on four main issues: whether muffler and exhaust changes should be enforced roadside or through the state inspection system; numeric sound limits and how to measure them; special rules for heavy trucks and engine-compression brakes (commonly called "Jake brakes"); and how to set up enforcement without overburdening law enforcement.

The committee kept the bill’s core inspection linkage but agreed to remove or revise language the members said was subjective or would be difficult for inspection stations to apply. Damian Leonard, counsel to the Senate Transportation Committee, walked members through the interaction between the proposed changes and existing inspection law, citing the inspection statute and the DMV manual’s sections that address exhaust systems. "Reject vehicle if the vehicle has no muffler," Leonard said, reading from the inspection manual’s guidance and noting other inspection failures such as nonmanufactured holes or components not securely fastened.

Members discussed two enforcement pathways: (1)…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans