Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Members, witnesses debate whether private sector should be allowed or credentialed to strike back against cyber attackers

2578573 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During the House Homeland Security hearing several members argued for stronger deterrence, including limited offensive options, while industry witnesses cautioned against private‑sector 'hack backs' and urged government leadership and safeguards.

Members of the House Homeland Security subcommittee and witnesses debated whether private companies should be empowered to conduct offensive cyber operations against attackers, and what role the federal government should play in deterrence and retaliation.

Representative Anthony D. Jimenez (questioner) framed the issue bluntly: ‘‘The only way that you’re gonna stop this is if the offensive party fears more the retaliation than what we do,’’ and he urged exploring offensive options or other mechanisms that impose consequences on attackers. Several members said the United States lacked a consistent retaliatory posture for many attacks…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans