Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Conservation Use Valuation Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Leader presents House resolution to raise CUVA acreage cap from 2,000 to 4,000 acres

2577153 · March 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A legislative leader told the Georgia Senate Rules Committee on March 11, 2025, that House Resolution 32 would place a constitutional amendment on the ballot to raise the CUVA acreage cap from 2,000 to 4,000 acres.

A legislative leader addressed the Georgia Senate Rules Committee on March 11, 2025, to present House Resolution 32, a proposed constitutional amendment to raise the acreage limit under the state’s Conservation Use Valuation Assessment (CUVA) from 2,000 to 4,000 acres.

The leader told senators the House language is substantively the same as an earlier Senate resolution carried by Senator Sam Watson but that a minor punctuation difference had been removed out of caution. "House resolution 32 is a constitutional amendment to increase the cap on CUVA, acreage from 2,000 to 4,000 acres," the leader said, adding that the ballot language otherwise matches the Senate version.

Committee members discussed procedural timing for committee reports and second reading; the leader reminded members that when a bill is reported out of committee it is typically placed on second reading the next legislative day. Senators asked procedural questions about committee handling and whether members should return to the chamber for presentations; the leader said the bills had come out of committee the day before and that members could choose to return but were not required to do so.

No committee vote on the constitutional amendment was recorded in the transcript of the Rules Committee meeting; the leader and other senators noted coordination with the Senate sponsor and that the House had made a small drafting adjustment while leaving ballot language unchanged.