Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Workforce Expansion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears bill to expand medical education funding, add residents to loan-repayment eligibility
Summary
Senate Bill 130 would broaden who qualifies for state medical-education reimbursements and add final-year residents and fellows as eligible for service-cancellable loan repayment programs; sponsors said no immediate new appropriation is requested and the committee agreed to take amendments and return for further consideration.
Senator Hodges presented Senate Bill 130 to expand the state's medical-education funding and the eligibility rules for the Georgia Board of Healthcare Workforce's service-cancellable loan programs.
"The purpose of this bill is to increase the number of health care providers in Georgia," Senator Hodges told the committee, adding the measure would expand program eligibility in two ways: broader institutional eligibility for resident reimbursement and allowing final-year residents and fellows to apply for loan-repayment awards.
Nut graf: Sponsors told the committee the bill is intended to help place new providers in underserved counties by letting residents and fellows apply before they finish training and by widening the types of institutions that can receive resident reimbursement payments. Committee members asked about fiscal impacts and program slots; sponsors said the bill does not request new appropriations and that current programs are competitive but managed with alternates when funding limits are reached.
Chet Bassin, executive director of the Georgia Board of Healthcare Workforce, explained how the existing program reimburses designated teaching hospitals up to $10,000 per resident and that the bill would change the term "designated teaching hospital" to "designated institutions," allowing facilities with a CMS number (for example some federally qualified health centers or stand-alone clinics) to participate if appropriated funding is available. He said the program would be funded pro rata if appropriations do not cover demand.
Committee members pressed on whether the change would make the program more competitive and whether the program manages sub-allotments or slot limits; Bassin described application windows, scoring mechanisms, and examples of specific slot counts the board manages for sub-programs. Representative Clark asked whether funds would need to increase; the sponsor and board staff answered that the bill itself does not request additional money but could increase competition for existing funds.
The sponsor offered author amendments to expand a minimum data set and add a list of state licensees to an existing statute (discussed with legislative counsel); committee members asked to see the drafted lines. The committee chair said the bill would be held for a committee substitute and that written language would be provided at the next meeting so members could review the amendments.
Ending: The committee did not vote on the bill that day; members asked for a written committee substitute reflecting the drafting changes and indicated they would return for further consideration.
