Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kane County Human Services Committee forwards travel-policy amendment requiring preapproval for board travel over $300
Summary
The committee voted to send a resolution to amend Kane County financial policies so board-member travel expenses of $300 or more require committee preapproval; members debated the $300 threshold, reimbursement timing and whether the policy applies to elected offices.
The Kane County Human Services Committee voted on March 12 to forward a resolution amending the county’s financial policy on travel so that county board members must obtain committee preapproval for travel expenses totaling $300 or more.
Jamie, Department of Human Resource Management, told the committee the draft policy adds an approval process for county board members and does not change internal approvals for county employees; the policy as presented sets the threshold at $300. Jamie said the $300 figure was an initial estimate intended to capture overnight travel and conference registrations that typically exceed local mileage costs.
Committee discussion focused on the threshold, what expenses count toward the $300 total (mileage, parking, registration, lodging), how preapproval would be obtained and whether reimbursement should be contingent on a post-trip report. A committee member asked whether the parent committee approval would bind the full board; Jamie said committee approval is effectively a preapproval and the full board and auditor still review reimbursements in the normal course.
Some members emphasized the policy’s role as a transparency and tracking tool. “The whole point is that it’s a communication tool so that we know who’s going where and why they’re going,” one committee member said, noting members often return from conferences without providing a summary of benefits to the county.
Other members asked whether the policy would apply to elected officeholders such as the sheriff or the county clerk. Assistant State’s Attorney Frank advised that the county’s ability to enforce new reporting requirements for independently elected offices is limited; the committee clarified that the policy is intended to govern county board members (the 24-member board) rather than separately elected office budgets.
The draft also specifies a 60-day window for submitting reimbursement requests and includes a requirement that a completed trip form be submitted with the reimbursement. Committee member Greif moved to forward the resolution; Garcia seconded. The committee voted to send the draft travel policy to the full board for consideration.
Committee members asked human resources to coordinate with finance and the auditor’s office to refine language and to ensure the required post-trip documentation and timetable for reimbursement are explicit before the document advances further in the approval chain.
