Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Program Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee flags decision points for safe-haven, maternal-child and domestic-violence funding
Summary
Members reviewed a clustered decision package that rolled several public-health initiatives together, including safe-haven funding, maternal-child health and domestic-violence programs, and asked staff for a written breakout of the contract and grant amounts before taking action.
Get email alerts on the Public Health Program Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senators on the Human Resources Division said they need clearer line-item detail before deciding how to allocate dollars among maternal-child health, domestic-violence services and a safe-haven program rolled into a larger decision package.
Senator Davison and other members reviewed a long-sheet staff document and identified a decision point: the maternal-child health program, which the chair's notes showed as $2 million in the governor's budget, but not funded by the House. At the same time, committee materials suggested the House redirected some funds into domestic-violence and sexual-assault prevention. A committee member summarized the pattern: on paper it "looks like" the House took maternal-child funding and prioritized domestic-violence work instead.
On safe havens, committee staff said the base was $2.25 million, with the governor adding $500,000 and the House adding about $440,000; staff explained those amounts are rolled into a larger decision package rather than listed as separate line items. Stephanie, a committee staff member, told the panel the $2.25 million figure includes multiple items: "inclusive of that is the 500,000 for safe havens. There's 500,000 for [domestic] violence prevention. There's a million for 24 hour crisis intervention." The group asked staff to provide a written, itemized breakout so members could see the exact totals for each program.
Members also noted a change to fetal alcohol spectrum disorder funding: committee materials showed a restoration of a 3% cut and an increase to roughly $350,000 in one step and to $661,000 in another instance after an amendment from a House member. Stephanie said the increase to $661,000 reflected an amendment (sponsored in the House) that added FTE support to the University of North Dakota's program.
Ending: Committee staff agreed to email or include in testimony an itemized breakout of the decision package showing how much is allocated to maternal-child health, safe havens, domestic-violence prevention, crisis intervention and the fetal alcohol spectrum disorder line, so senators can decide whether to restore or reallocate funds when they consider amendments.
