Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landscaping Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beavercreek council adopts revised weeds-and-grass rule, adds grandfathering and invasive-species ban
Summary
Beavercreek — The Beavercreek City Council on second reading voted to adopt Ordinance 25-05, revising Section 97.1 of the Beavercreek codified ordinances to update rules on yard maintenance and landscaping.
Get email alerts on the Landscaping Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beavercreek — The Beavercreek City Council on second reading voted to adopt Ordinance 25-05, revising Section 97.1 of the Beavercreek codified ordinances to update rules on yard maintenance and landscaping.
The ordinance, as amended, retains a 50% limit on front-yard landscaping areas but adds a grandfather clause that preserves existing landscaped areas above that threshold provided they are maintained and otherwise lawful. It also authorizes a waiver of the three-foot setback requirement where steep slopes create erosion risks, and it prohibits planting invasive species “as defined by the Ohio Administrative Code 901:5-30-01” in both public and private spaces — language the council added by amendment before final approval.
City staff described the changes as clarifications and technical fixes to carry out the council’s intent after public comment and a first reading. A staff memo presented at the meeting said the revised text replaces the existing Exhibit A, subsection F6, and should read: “the planting of invasive species as defined by the Ohio Administrative Code 901:5-30-01 shall be prohibited in both public and private spaces.” The council moved and seconded an amendment adopting that sentence and then voted to approve the ordinance as amended.
Why it matters: The ordinance affects how homeowners, gardeners and code enforcement handle front-yard plantings, mailbox or curbside plantings and long-standing landscaped beds. Council members and members of the public told the council they wanted clearer rules on how the right-of-way is measured, how the 50% calculation is applied and how enforcement would treat long-established plantings.
Key provisions and council discussion
- Grandfathering: The ordinance bars retroactive enforcement that would force property owners to remove existing landscaping that already exceeds the 50% front-yard threshold, provided the planted areas are “managed and maintained” and remain otherwise lawful. Staff noted the city maintains aerial photos dating back to at least 2011 to document prior conditions.
- Setback waiver for erosion: Because a strict three-foot setback requirement could worsen erosion on steep slopes, staff proposed and the council adopted language allowing a waiver when significant erosion is evident.
- Invasive-species prohibition: Council amended the ordinance at second reading to cite Ohio Administrative Code 901:5-30-01 as the authority for listing prohibited invasive species. Councilmember comment noted that the OAC lists roughly 63 invasive species and that a named list would aid enforcement.
Public comment and concerns
Several residents spoke during citizen comment. Deborah Whitaker, a former Girl Scout and resident, thanked staff and council for responsiveness but asked for clearer guidance on determining the public right-of-way and how pedestrian pathways will be counted in the 50% calculation. She said gardening is “a very dynamic process” and expressed concern about rules that might impede routine plant adjustments.
Valerie Van Greetheisen, a retired engineer, questioned the scientific basis for selecting a 50% threshold and asked why another percentage was not chosen.
Debbie Carr, who said she reviewed other municipal ordinances, called for clearer language on maintaining the public right-of-way and said the ordinance should focus on how plantings are managed regardless of their area.
Council response and next steps
Council members thanked residents and staff for participation. Several members said they reviewed the prior meeting’s video and citizen input and that the adopted changes reflect that feedback. Staff indicated enforcement would be case-by-case, using aerial imagery and site visits to determine whether a planting was existing and maintained; new plantings that exceed the threshold would be subject to the ordinance.
Votes and formal actions
- Motion to amend Exhibit A, subsection F6, to read: “the planting of invasive species as defined by the Ohio Administrative Code 901:5-30-01 shall be prohibited in both public and private spaces.” Motion moved and seconded; council voted to adopt the amendment.
- Motion to approve Ordinance 25-05 as amended (second reading). Motion moved and seconded; council voted to approve the ordinance.
Ending
Staff said the amended ordinance will guide future code enforcement visits and that existing, well-maintained landscaped areas will be preserved under the grandfather clause. Several council members said they expected the clearer invasive-species citation to make enforcement more consistent.

