Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chappaqua schedules Tri-States literacy review after STEAM evaluation
Summary
The board said the Tri-States Consortium will visit in October for a three-day review focusing on K–4 literacy and alignment with the science-of-reading guidance; the district will post the written report and use findings to guide curriculum planning.
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Chappaqua Central School District told the board on March 5 that the Tri-States Consortium will conduct a three-day review next October focused on the district’s K–4 literacy program and alignment with the New York State science-of-reading guidance.
The district has used the Tri-States Consortium on a three-year cycle; staff said the recent visit focused on STEAM and produced a written evaluation that the district used to adjust programming. The upcoming review will deploy a different set of regional experts — reading teachers, curriculum directors and administrators — who will conduct document reviews, examine student work and spend most of their time observing classrooms.
Why it matters: The written Tri-States report is typically presented to the board and posted on the district website; administrators said they will use the findings to guide literacy instruction and curriculum decisions for the elementary grades.
Presentation details District staff (who framed the schedule) described the Tri-States review process as one that brings practitioners from across the region to observe practices and advise on alignment with state rubrics and evidence-based reading instruction. The guiding question for the literacy visit was stated as: To what extent do classroom teaching practices align with the science of reading as defined by New York State briefs and the New York State rubric.
Administration said the Tri-States team will provide a written report to the district after the visit, and that past reports have been shared with the board and placed on the district website for public review.

