Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Town Hall Bylaws topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board delays update to East Region Town Hall bylaws after supervisor flags ZIP-code wording

2565457 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board agreed to pull Item 5.11, an update to the East Region Town Hall Advisory Board bylaws, after a supervisor pointed out an omission of ZIP code 95424 in the description of covered unincorporated areas; staff will return the item after the town hall or at the next appropriate meeting.

Supervisors agreed to delay action on proposed updates to the East Region Town Hall Advisory Board bylaws after a supervisor said the draft cited unincorporated areas only in ZIP code 95422 and asked the town hall to consider including 95424.

County staff identified the needed correction as a minor change to a citation in the bylaws and said the proposal would correct a Government Code cross-reference tied to the Brown Act. Supervisor Spatier said his home is within the 95424 area north of Clear Lake Park and recommended the draft include 95424 so that Windflower Point and adjacent neighborhoods are clearly within the advisory board—s coverage.

County counsel noted the board could approve the bylaws with an amendment or pull the item and return it after the town hall reviews the change. The supervisor said he preferred giving the town hall the opportunity to consider the addition rather than approving the change unilaterally. The board agreed to bring the item back in about two weeks or at the town hall's next meeting, and no formal action was taken at this meeting.

Staff said the proposed bylaws contained an incorrect cross-reference to Government Code section numbering and requested changing the citation to clarify Brown Act references. The board opened the item for public comment and received none; the item was closed for later reconsideration.