Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council amends and approves courthouse security-camera appropriation after vendor price concession and member concerns
Summary
Vigo County approved an amended appropriation for a courthouse camera system after staff reported a vendor price reduction and council members asked for additional quotes and pricing verification.
The Vigo County Council voted to amend and then approve an additional appropriation for replacing courthouse security cameras after staff said vendor ICS agreed to reduce its price and after council members pressed for more competitive quotes and clarity on pricing.
County staff reported that ICS agreed to lower its package to $110,912 and that the proposed purchase would replace 12 existing IP cameras with new hardware covered by a five-year parts-and-labor warranty. A staff presenter explained the difference between earlier estimates and the vendor package as being due to replacement of existing cameras and the newer equipment’s improved quality and warranty.
Councilman Randy Gentry expressed concern that the county’s cost for the cameras was higher than retail and that staff should obtain multiple quotes to ensure the county was getting a competitive price. “I want to make sure the record is clear that…there’s like 495 listings for these cameras if you Google the model numbers,” Gentry said. He also said he had checked manufacturer-authorized vendors and found the county’s quoted price appeared to be substantially above manufacturer retail prices.
Councilwoman Brenda Wilson moved to amend the additional appropriation to reflect the $110,912 figure; the amendment passed by roll call 5–1 (Councilman Gentry voted no). The council then voted to approve the amended appropriation; that final motion also passed 5–1.
Supporters said the five-year warranty and full replacement of older cameras justified the purchase and recommended proceeding to improve courthouse security. Opponents urged additional competitive bids and clear documentation of why the chosen package differed from retail pricing.
County staff said they would continue to seek other estimates where possible and provide documentation to the council. The appropriation is approved as amended; staff must complete procurement consistent with county purchasing rules.
