Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Agriculture Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves farm‑to‑table planned development with market and restaurant at Pruitt and Taylor

2563190 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A roughly 9.22‑acre parcel at Pruitt Road and Taylor Road was rezoned to a planned development for an agricultural‑focused mixed‑use project including a working farm, meeting house/restaurant and market; staff and the zoning hearing master recommended approval despite Planning Commission concerns about commercial locational criteria.

Hillsborough County commissioners on March 11 approved a planned development to permit a mixed‑use, farm‑oriented project on about 9.22 acres at the southwest corner of Pruitt Road and Taylor Road that will include agricultural operations, a farm‑to‑table restaurant, a curated market and meeting space.

Development Services staff and the zoning hearing master recommended approval; Planning Commission staff found the proposal inconsistent with the Residential‑1 future land use because the commercial/retail portion does not meet the 900‑foot commercial locational criteria and may be incompatible with the surrounding rural residential and agricultural pattern.

Steven Spazad, a planner with Level Up Consulting, described the project as an "authentic, farm to table" development with most of the site preserved as a working farm and a smaller corner pod for a meeting house, sit‑down restaurant and market. Jillian Massey of Planning Commission staff told commissioners the subject property lies in the rural area and in a Residential‑1 future land use category; she said the site does not meet commercial locational criteria and that commercial and retail components raised compatibility concerns. The zoning hearing master found that proposed design elements — including a 75‑foot buffer from residential to the west and 20‑foot buffers with Type B screening along rights of way — would mitigate impacts, and no opposition testimony was filed at the hearing.

The board voted 7–0 to approve the planned development as conditioned; the zoning hearing master’s recommended condition requires commercial buildings in Pod B to be constructed with materials and features consistent with an agricultural aesthetic, and the project record includes buffer commitments intended to reduce impacts on adjacent rural residential properties.