Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Ell Newcomers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves changes to newcomer English‑learner programming after debate and public comment
Summary
The board voted to accept district recommendations to shorten newcomer program duration to one year and increase integration with neighborhood schools; the proposal drew questions from teachers, parents and advocacy groups during public comment and a split vote from one board member.
The Saint Louis Public Schools Board of Education on March 11 voted to accept district recommendations to realign newcomer English‑learner programming, including reducing the program’s maximum duration from two years to one year and increasing integration of newcomer students with English‑speaking peers.
Chief of Schools Allison Dino and Executive Director Alia Gonzales del Castillo presented the administration’s findings on newcomer enrollment, screening and outcomes. They said newcomer enrollment had risen to more than 940 students at the time of the presentation and that the district’s recommendations were intended to align local programming with federal guidance in a 2015 U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice "Dear Colleague" letter, which urges that newcomer supports should not create unnecessary segregation and that typical newcomer program duration is about one year.
Gonzales described three pillars of classroom practice the district intends to emphasize — content and language objectives, linguistic supports, and peer interaction — and recommended a 15:1 staffing ratio for newly aligned K‑5 newcomer classes. The administration said the change is intended to be revenue neutral and that transition planning would involve school‑based teams and family input.
The recommendation drew extensive public comment. Teachers, newcomer center staff and parents urged delay, additional data, and fuller stakeholder consultation. Several speakers described students who benefited from longer newcomer placements; a high‑school teacher and other staff described newcomers arriving with interrupted formal education who, they said, required more than one year to reach language and content readiness. An educational researcher and newcomer teachers raised methodological concerns about the district’s data comparisons and sample sizes used to justify the change.
Board debate included clarifying questions about parental notification, staffing reallocation, and how services would continue after students transitioned to neighborhood schools. Board member Ben Conover moved to accept the recommendations; the motion was seconded by Mister Hikes. The roll call recorded one ‘‘No’’ vote from Miss Hubbard and passed with the remainder voting Yes.
Why it matters: The change affects where and how newly arrived English learners receive instruction across elementary, middle and high school newcomer sites. The district described the plan as aligning programming with federal guidance and increasing opportunities for peer integration; opponents said the change risks reducing continuity and specialized support for students who arrive with interrupted schooling or high nonacademic needs.
Implementation and next steps: Administration said it will assemble school‑level transition teams, conduct an FAQ and invite family participation; staff requested a phased, data‑driven approach and additional district‑wide PD. Several public commenters asked the board to delay implementation and provide longitudinal data comparing different placement models before the changes take effect.
Ending: The board approved the recommendation with one dissenting vote and instructed the administration to continue planning with school staff and families.
