Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission adopts new rules of procedure, moving agenda publication earlier and requiring two hearings for most items
Summary
After debate and two amendments, the Board of County Commissioners approved revised rules of procedure that move agenda publication earlier, generally require two hearings on most items, and preserve a suspension mechanism for urgent matters; the measure passed 4‑1.
Bernalillo County commissioners voted 4‑1 to adopt revisions to the board’s rules of procedure that change the agenda‑publishing timeline and generally require two hearings for most items, while preserving a suspension process for urgent action.
Chair Olivas — who introduced the package of procedural changes and worked with staff to draft the revisions — said one of the principal changes moves the deadline for publishing meeting materials back by one weekday. Under the new rules the deadline is set at 120 hours (effectively Thursday at 5 p.m. for regular Tuesday meetings), increasing public review time compared with the prior practice of Friday publication.
The revisions also establish two substantive hearings for most resolutions and similar actions so that items are generally introduced on one meeting and approved at a subsequent meeting. The rules create exceptions and retain a defined procedure to suspend rules for urgent business; suspension requires an “extraordinary” majority as defined in the rules (for a five‑member quorum, a four‑vote majority).
The commission debated several proposed edits during the meeting, including a change to the parliamentary inquiry language. Commissioners removed a sentence that had said a chair’s parliamentary opinion was not subject to appeal; the revised language retains the chair’s ability to recognize parliamentary inquiries but leaves appeals and other procedural remedies to existing rules and Robert’s Rules default language. An additional amendment that would have exempted financial resolutions (FRs) from the two‑hearing requirement failed for lack of a second.
County Manager and senior staff said they participated in drafting the changes and asked the commission to evaluate the rule package after a trial period. “If after a year we come back to you and say we’re having a hard time with this part or that part, I would be happy to work with the chair to…report out to you how you think this works,” the county manager said. Commissioners discussed the tension between providing more notice to the public and ensuring the county can accept time‑sensitive grants or budget actions; staff noted the suspension mechanism permits expedited action when four commissioners agree.
After debate and amendments the motion to adopt the rules carried on a 4‑1 roll call (Commissioner Benson recorded a no vote). The chair said the new rules will take effect after the customary two‑week delay for rule changes and that staff will return with operational feedback if adjustments are needed.
