Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Automated Speed Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committees advance bill expanding automated speed-enforcement programs with amendments narrowing scope and changing funding
Summary
Senators voted to pass House Bill 697 with amendments that raised the citation threshold, redirect funding away from general funds, and limit review authority to law enforcement staff rather than Department of Transportation personnel.
Senators on joint committees advanced House Bill 697 on March 10 after amendments meant to reduce court workload and address privacy concerns tied to automated speed-enforcement systems.
House Bill 697 would allow additional categories of personnel to review recorded images produced by automated speed-enforcement systems and would make other changes to the program. Rob Insichita, speaking for the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT), told the committee the department “stands by our submitted testimony and support,” and said HDOT preferred that program funding come from the highway special fund or the automated speed enforcement fund rather than general revenues.
Several witnesses urged caution. Nathan Mee of the ASU of Hawaii raised privacy concerns about expanding the number of people who can access surveillance footage and argued that assigning review responsibilities to agencies outside traditional law enforcement increases the risk of breaches and public distrust. A representative from the judiciary warned that expanding who can submit citations would increase the court’s processing burden and asked the committees to work with HDOT and the Department of Law Enforcement to manage expected volume; the judiciary said it processes roughly 2,000 red-light camera citations per month and would provide more detailed data to the committee on contest rates.
Committee amendments adopted during decision-making narrowed the bill’s immediate scope and sought to address those concerns: the committees raised the minimum speed threshold for automated citations to 7 miles per hour over the posted limit, moved the funding source recommendation from general revenues to the highway special fund, and limited citation-review authority to law enforcement personnel (removing Department of Transportation staff from the list of authorized reviewers). The measure was passed out of committee with those amendments and will advance to additional committees (Judiciary and Ways and Means) for further consideration.
Committee roll calls on the measure showed unanimous “aye” votes from the named members recorded in the hearing for both committees considering the bill; chairs noted this is a work in progress and further detail will be addressed in subsequent committees.
