Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hutchinson County reviews health-plan claims, sees pharmacy costs driving upcoming renewal
Summary
County benefits consultants told commissioners that recent high-cost medical and pharmacy claims are stabilizing but pharmacy spending — notably chemotherapy and newer diabetes medications — is driving higher prescription costs ahead of an April rate decision.
Kathy Davenport, a wellness and benefits consultant for the pool that insures Hutchinson County, told the Hutchinson County Commissioners Court that the county’s combined group health plans are seeing a modest easing in previously very high claims but that prescription costs have jumped and will be a major factor in the upcoming renewal.
Davenport said the county’s 12‑month claims or loss ratio is 124.76%, down from a prior 147% figure and near the county’s six‑year average of about 116%. “All of you have been here through some extremely bad claims. We are starting to see those in the claims data start to turn down,” she said. She added the insurance pool returned roughly $30,000 to the county over the past six years from investment surplus distributions.
The consultants emphasized that pharmacy spending has increased faster than medical inflation. “Number one was your cancer or chemotherapy at just over 123,000,” Stacy Brewington said when reviewing prescription categories; she also flagged costly diabetic medications and heart‑related drugs as top drivers. The presenters told the court that infusions and new branded diabetes drugs are major contributors to pharmacy cost growth.
Why it matters: Hutchinson County’s renewal rates will be set after the pool’s board meets April 30. Consultants said the pool’s average renewal, aided by membership in the pool, is about 9% year over year (compared with roughly 20% outside the pool). Consultants warned the county to expect a renewal process this spring and encouraged using wellness programs to reduce future catastrophic claims.
Details from the review: Davenport and Brewington reviewed diagnostic drivers and chronic‑condition impacts. For the past three plan years cancer was the largest medical spend category; more recently high blood pressure and diabetes increased in rank, and respiratory conditions (COPD, asthma) also accounted for sizable spend. Davenport noted that among an average enrollment of 103 employees, only 26 met the plan’s definition of a “high‑cost claimant” (claims above $10,000), and most of those were employees rather than dependents.
The consultants walked commissioners through participation in county wellness resources. Teladoc, Omada and Wonder Health are available at no out‑of‑pocket cost through the pool. Reported engagement for the most recent plan year included 46 members using Teladoc, six in Wonder Health, and seven in Omada. The county received employer‑reward funds tied to participation; Davenport said the county’s employer rewards increased from $3,500 the prior year by about $210.
Recommended strategies: The consultants urged boosting enrollment in chronic‑condition prevention and management programs (Teladoc, Omada, Wonder Health), expanding awareness of mental‑health options (employee assistance program, Learn to Live, Blue Cross Blue Shield behavioral‑health benefits), and targeting members with musculoskeletal issues toward available virtual resources. They also said the pool is evaluating pharmacy benefit strategies but is cautious about changing pharmacy benefit managers because of possible disruption to members.
Timeline: Davenport said the pool board meets April 30 to set rates; renewal webinars for members are planned in mid‑May; renewal offers will be sent on or about May 23, and a county decision/return date is tentatively scheduled for June (subject to change).
Commissioner questions and context: Commissioners asked whether the diagnostic categories are apples‑to‑apples year to year; the consultants said the diagnostic coding is comparable but a single high‑cost claimant in one year can skew the totals. Commissioners also asked about the size and age mix of the county group; consultants said Hutchinson County’s demographics and regional access to care (patients often sent to Abilene, Lubbock or Amarillo, with occasional referrals to Dallas or Houston) are typical for pool members in that territory.
What’s next: Consultants offered to return for a deeper workshop and to provide materials for courthouse distribution to raise member participation in preventive care and chronic‑condition programs. The commissioners did not take formal action on benefits at the meeting; the pool’s April 30 board decision and the county’s internal renewal process will determine final rates.
