Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Law Enforcement Policy Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shoreline board adopts revisions on law-enforcement relations and approves consent agenda items
Summary
The board unanimously approved revisions to a district policy (03/1926) and rescinded two older policies to adopt a consolidated new policy on district relationships with law enforcement and other government agencies (new 04/2010). Directors also approved the consent agenda (items 6A–6E). The new law-enforcement policy adds a cross-reference to
The Shoreline School Board took three formal actions during the meeting: approval of the consent agenda (items 6A–6E), adoption of revisions to policy 03/1926 (second reading), and rescission of two policies with adoption of a new policy on district relationships with law enforcement and other government agencies (new Policy 04/2010).
Consent agenda: Directors voted to approve consent agenda items 6A through 6E. The student representatives provided advisory votes (all "Aye"). A motion to approve was made by Director Cohen, seconded by Vice President Hill; the motion carried unanimously.
Policy 03/1926 (second reading and adoption): The board adopted revisions to Policy 03/1926 at second reading. Superintendent Reyes noted minor edits since the first reading: removals of references tied to a federal ICE protocol that had been rescinded, with other underscored model language retained. The motion to adopt was moved by Director Cohen, seconded by Vice President Hill, and carried unanimously. Student representatives gave advisory "Aye" votes before the board vote.
Rescission and adoption: The board rescinded prior policies 04/2010 (Contacts with Staff) and 04/4411 (Relations with Law Enforcement and Child Protective Agencies) and adopted a consolidated new policy titled "District Relationships with Law Enforcement and Other Government Agencies" (new 04/2010). Legal counsel recommended adding language referencing a now-rescinded federal directive on "sensitive locations;" the board included a statement expressing district support for treating schools as sensitive locations even though the federal guidance had been rescinded. A cross-reference to Policy 4,300 was added following counsel's suggestion. The motion to rescind and adopt was moved by Director Cohen, seconded by Vice President Hill, and carried unanimously.
Why it matters: The adopted law-enforcement policy formalizes the district's stance and procedures for interactions with law enforcement and child-protective agencies, and explicitly states the district's support for designating schools as sensitive locations even after a federal rescission — a position legal counsel said the district may take. Board members said adding that language aligned with district values and reiterated prior district practice and communications to staff and the community.
Votes at a glance: - Consent agenda (Items 6A–6E): motion by Director Cohen; second by Vice President Hill; outcome: approved unanimously (student advisory votes: all "Aye"). - Revision to Policy 03/1926 (second reading): motion by Director Cohen; second by Vice President Hill; outcome: adopted unanimously (student advisory votes: all "Aye"). - Rescind Policies 04/2010 and 04/4411; adopt new Policy 04/2010 (District Relationships with Law Enforcement and Other Government Agencies): motion by Director Cohen; second by Vice President Hill; outcome: adopted unanimously (student advisory votes: all "Aye").
Ending: Board members said no immediate operational changes beyond implementing the updated policy were required; Superintendent Reyes and legal counsel will continue to circulate explanatory guidance to staff and the community and monitor any state or federal changes affecting the policy.
