Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Animal Rescue Sales Tax topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee sends House Bill 263 to amendment order after testimony from animal rescues

2551814 · March 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Charlie Shepherd asked the Senate Local Government and Taxation Committee to send House Bill 263 to the fourteenth order after testifying that recent Tax Commission guidance could require small nonprofit rescues to collect sales tax on adoption fees.

Bill purpose and sponsor remarks Representative Charlie Shepherd (District 7) introduced House Bill 263 to clarify that nonprofit animal rescues' rehoming/adoption fees are a service and not taxable sales of tangible personal property. Shepherd said the Tax Commission recently determined adoption fees are taxable and rescues are being asked to pay sales tax they had not previously collected.

Testimony from rescues and counsel Ken McClure, a volunteer who helped draft the bill, told the committee he attempted to resolve the issue at the Tax Commission but was unsuccessful; he said the legislation was drafted to protect small 501(c)(3) rescues that cannot afford litigation. "At the time I drafted this, I wasn't aware that the cities were in this business," McClure said, noting the bill as written covers nonprofits but not municipal shelters. Several nonprofit rescuers testified: Mandy Stuhan (Horse and Halo Horse Rescue), Sharon Hellman Dollar (Take Me Home Dog Rescue), and Catherine White (Freedom Bound Hounds) described the costs of vet care, transport, sterilization and training and said taxing adoption fees would reduce funds available for care and future rescues.

Municipalities and statutory scope Committee members asked whether municipal shelters or joint-powers shelters would be covered; McClure and witnesses said the bill as drafted covers nonprofit 501(c)(3) organizations and does not explicitly exempt municipal shelter operations, and that adding cities could change the fiscal note. Senator Anton and others urged fixing the municipal issue in the fourteenth order.

Fiscal note and retroactivity language Sponsor and counsel said the bill was drafted so rescues would not be retroactively liable for past unpaid tax assessments if the legislation clarifies the practice: McClure said he attempted to give small charities the same protection they might get if they litigated and won, noting quirks in statute of limitations where the commission could seek long-past taxes if sales tax returns were never filed.

Committee action Senator Anton moved and Senator Den Hartog seconded a motion to send House Bill 263 to the fourteenth order for possible amendment; the committee approved the motion. Senators and testifiers urged that the sponsor work to ensure cities and joint powers shelters are considered in later amendments.

What the record does and does not show The transcript includes sponsor and multiple nonprofit witnesses describing program costs and the rescues' reliance on adoption fees and donations; it does not include a full fiscal note text in the spoken record presented here, though the sponsor said the fiscal note showed no state financial impact as the fees had not been collected historically.