Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Protection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to clarify court order allowing removal of alleged offender and keep child with protective parent
Summary
House Bill 159 would add a statutory mechanism allowing law enforcement, in consultation with child welfare, to obtain a court order removing an alleged offender from a home while leaving a child with a protective parent; the removed parent would be entitled to a shelter-care hearing within 48 hours.
The Senate Judiciary & Rules Committee voted to send House Bill 159 to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation after judges and legislators described operational confusion in existing law.
Senator Todd Lakey, R-23, introduced the bill and yielded time to Magistrate Judge Andrew Ellis of Ada County, who said the bill resolves contradictions in current Child Protection Act language that have prevented courts from using a tool intended to remove an alleged offender while leaving a child with a protective parent.
"We have this tool that appears to allow us to remove the offender and leave the child in the home, with the safe and protective parent. But in actuality, the way our statutes currently exist, we cannot do that," Judge Ellis told the committee. He explained the proposed text eliminates inconsistent references to a "protective order" and replaces them with a clear process for an immediate removal order.
Under testimony, the operational steps are: law enforcement, often after consultation with Department of Health and Welfare social workers and county prosecutors, may seek an order based on officer testimony or a sworn affidavit; a judge (day or on-call magistrate) can issue the order; law enforcement executes the order to remove the alleged offender; and the removed parent receives notice of a shelter-care hearing within 48 hours to contest continued removal.
Senators asked procedural questions to ensure child safety is prioritized and to clarify that many cases arise from prior investigation and referrals rather than only "hot" on-the-doorstep incidents. Judge Ellis said the new statutory section restores a tool he and other judges believed was available but that contradictory language in the code made unusable.
A motion to send House Bill 159 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation was made by Senator Wintrow and seconded by Senator Keiser; the motion carried on a committee vote.
No amendments were offered during the hearing.
