Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Nantucket HDC pauses decision after neighbors say 8 North Mill was built 5 feet off approved site
Summary
The Historic District Commission heard objections from abutters and staff about an unapproved five‑foot shift of a new house toward Angola Street, then voted to visit the site and return with cross‑section drawings and a review of sewer easement constraints.
The Nantucket Historic District Commission on March 11 delayed deciding whether to validate the siting of a new house at 8 North Mill Street after neighbors and staff described an unapproved 5‑foot move toward Angola Street and raised questions about grading and a sewer easement.
The commission voted unanimously to perform an on‑site view to study the structure’s relationship to nearby lots and the street, and to return at a subsequent meeting with cross‑section drawings showing existing and proposed grades. Commissioners also voted unanimously to “track” a linked hardscape revision so that the house move and hardscape are considered together.
Why it matters: Abutters say the change reduces space for landscaping and raises concerns about how the house’s exposed foundation and added fill affect the streetscape. Staff said access limits inside a town sewer easement may prevent the privet and foundation plantings the applicant proposes as mitigation. The commission’s view and requested drawings are intended to give members material to determine whether the siting is appropriate under the HDC’s standards.
What was said: Chair Kathy opened the hearing by reminding attendees of the commission’s public‑hearing protocols and asking speakers to confine remarks to architectural appropriateness. Preservation planner Holly summarized staff’s review, noting the town’s Sewer Department had approved a reduction of a previously shown 10‑foot sewer easement to 5 feet, and warned that planting within the easement “may not be feasible” and that the revised landscape plan should clearly annotate that easement and planting limitations.
Abutter Fred Mueller, who said he and family members hold adjacent property, told the commission that the owner “poured the foundation and built the home 5 feet closer to Angola Street than specified in his approved plan” and said the relocation was done without an amended certificate of appropriateness and prompted a cease‑and‑desist letter.
Commissioners focused on visible effects: several members said photos and a site visit showed steeper slopes and more exposed foundation than expected and questioned whether a water‑struck brick veneer shown in the COA would be supported by the existing foundation condition. Commissioner Joe noted the project produces some benefits (greater separation between the main house and garage) but asked the applicant to demonstrate feasible mitigation where the sewer easement limits planting.
Outcome and next steps: The HDC unanimously voted to (1) conduct a site view to study the character and setting of the lot versus nearby properties and (2) require cross‑section drawings showing proposed vs. existing grades and the relationship of plantings to the sewer easement. The commission also decided to take up the later hardscape item together with the siting question at the next old‑business meeting.
Background details: The house was reviewed by the commission in 2023; the owner says they thought an earlier plan allowed the current location. Town building staff earlier issued a cease‑and‑desist after the foundation was poured. The applicant’s agent told the commission the foundation has since been tarred and backfilled and that some utilities were put underground as part of the work.
