Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Performance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts Healthy Buildings Ordinance after amendments; rulemaking later will set standards
Summary
After extended public comment and amendment, Evanston’s City Council adopted the Healthy Buildings Ordinance (HBO) on March 10. The ordinance establishes building performance standards with a 25‑year timeline, creates rulemaking bodies with stakeholder representation, and preserves council oversight of rules before they are enforceable.
Evanston’s City Council on March 10 adopted an ordinance establishing a building performance framework known locally as the Healthy Buildings Ordinance (HBO). The measure — moved by Council Member Nussbaum and adopted after a package of amendments — passed on a council vote; several amendments clarified rule‑making roles, equity priority designations and stakeholder representation on technical committees.
The ordinance covers large buildings already tracked by the city’s benchmarking program and creates a staged timeline for reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions; staff and supporters described the HBO as a 25‑year implementation with interim targets and a future rulemaking process to set technical requirements. As adopted, the ordinance makes rule adoption a separate step: no new compliance penalties take effect until council approves rules developed through a technical committee and a Healthy Buildings Accountability Board.
Supporters who spoke during a long public comment period argued the ordinance is an essential local climate step and praised amendments that added building owner representation to technical committees and required affordability and equity considerations during rule drafting. "None of the scaremongering claims that people have made have materialized," said Ryan Wilmington of Illinois Green Alliance; Climate Action Evanston’s Executive Director Jack Jordan asked building owners to participate in the technical committee and urged action for future generations.
Opponents — including local property owners, landlords and lenders who addressed the council in public comment — warned about costs, lender reactions and potential impacts on housing affordability. Speakers said uncertainty about financing and utility upgrades (for example, electrical service upgrades in older buildings) could prompt some owners to sell or lead to rent increases. Several speakers asked council to delay final adoption until rules were drafted. Council Member Reid and others said they share affordability concerns and asked for strong reporting and data during implementation.
Council members debated the amendments and the process. Council Member Nussbaum said the final draft addressed earlier drafting errors and ensured greater stakeholder representation in rulemaking; Council Member Kelly opposed the measure and raised concerns about process timing and risk to residents and condo associations. Council Member Burns moved the packet’s set of amendments; the council voted to adopt the amendments and then to adopt the ordinance as amended.
Key procedural points: the ordinance requires rulemaking before enforcement, adds seats for building owners on the technical committee (including nominations from owner groups), and clarifies that a building is an “equity‑priority building” only after explicit designation by the accountability board rather than by automatic status based on nonprofit or housing designation.
Votes at a glance: Ordinance 10‑25 (Healthy Buildings Ordinance) — mover: Council Member Nussbaum; seconder: Council Member Reid; vote recorded in roll call: 7 ayes, 1 nay (Council Member Kelly); outcome: adopted as amended.
Why it matters: The HBO sets a long‑term regulatory pathway for reducing emissions from Evanston’s largest buildings, an important local step in the city’s climate action plan. The council’s adoption puts the city on a path to specific rule drafting, but the most consequential technical and compliance details will be developed later via the rulemaking bodies the ordinance establishes.
