Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment Commission topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council publishes RDC investigation findings, reappoints two members amid disagreement over representation
Summary
After an internal review that found no misconduct, the council reappointed John Good and Peter Bridal to the DeKalb County Redevelopment Commission. A motion to replace them with nominees from Garrett and the east side failed for lack of a second, prompting public comment and a split among council members.
The DeKalb County Council received a summary of an investigation into actions by the Redevelopment Commission (RDC) and then reappointed two incumbent RDC members following contested nominations.
A council member reported the investigation’s conclusions: the RDC “did not at any time do anything improper,” its members “were fully informed and acted in what they believed was in the best interest of the TIF districts and DeKalb County,” the RDC president “did not mislead, misrepresent, or withhold any information,” the vote to retain the SDI TIF funds was unanimous, and no conflict of interest was found. The same statement said there was no hidden agenda to use TIF funds to build a jail and that a cited conversation had been refuted by the RDC member in question.
Council members then discussed nominations for 2025 RDC terms. A motion to appoint Doug Demint (Garrett) and Will Fleeman (east-side resident) was made but failed for lack of a second. The council instead voted to reappoint John Good and Peter Bridal for 2025; the motion passed on a voice vote after a roll call-style request, with dissent voiced from at least one council member.
The exchange included debate about whether RDC appointments should prioritize geographic representation or experience with TIF and redevelopment work. One council member argued that appointees represent the county as a whole and should have relevant experience; others urged broader representation and criticized the council for not considering community nominees.
Public comment followed: a resident, Andrew Provins, urged the council to have given the proposed replacements a second so the full body could vote; he noted that the east-side council member did not second the nomination at the meeting.
The council also handled related appointments in the meeting: it approved Kristen (or Christian) Hoff to fill a vacancy on the Butler Library Board and approved Vivian Lykes as the Garrett Economic Development Board representative.
Why it matters: RDC members and TIF decisions affect local development, tax distribution and school funding; public debate reflects concerns about geographic representation, transparency and fiscal impacts on specific townships.
What’s next: Appointees will serve the 2025 term; council members and the public signaled continued interest in RDC composition and TIF use.
