Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves rezoning to commercial for Stamford Road parcel after split vote
Summary
The board approved a future land-use map amendment and rezoning to general commercial for 3010 Stamford Road by a 3-1 vote; staff had recommended denial citing surrounding residential pattern and future land-use category impacts.
The Panama City Planning Board voted 3-1 on March 10 to approve a request to amend the future land-use map and rezone 3010 Stamford Road from residential to general commercial. The applicant, Sean McNeal of McNeal Carroll Engineering, represented owner John Underwood.
Staff recommended denial, citing that the parcel is surrounded predominantly by Residential-1 and that changing the future land-use to general commercial could permit more intense development than the immediate residential pattern supports. Staff also noted that future land-use changes can open the door for more intense commercial build-out along arterials and that adjacency to R-1 increases the development restrictions on a newly rezoned parcel.
McNeal told the board the property already accommodates existing commercial activity and asked to “get the property right.” He said the parcel sits a few hundred feet from an industrial area and that commercial uses in the vicinity make the rezoning a logical progression.
Board discussion centered on land-use pattern and adjacency to residential parcels. One board member said the presence of a small residential parcel between the subject site and nearby industrial zoning influenced staff’s recommendation; another noted existing commercial activity in the area.
A motion to deny failed; a subsequent motion to approve passed on roll call: Carroll — yes; Barker — no; Rich — yes; Chairman Neubauer — yes. The motion passed 3-1.
The board’s approval changes the parcel’s future land-use and zoning classifications and will be forwarded to the City Commission for final action. Staff cautioned that amending the future land-use category could allow more intense build-out in the future and that development standards and setbacks applicable to general commercial parcels would apply.
