Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instruction And Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Instruction update: midyear assessments show gains; state SOL changes complicate comparisons
Summary
District leaders presented midyear assessment data showing gains in many grades and described alignment work between literacy plans and special‑education IEPs, while warning that new SOL standards and testing changes make year‑to‑year comparisons imprecise.
Winchester Public Schools instructional leaders gave a midyear report on assessment results, intervention alignment and special‑education progress at the March 10 work session. Presenters said predictive midyear measures show improvement in many grades and highlighted efforts to align literacy intervention plans with individualized education programs (IEPs).
Why it matters: the state will implement new Standards of Learning (SOL) in 2024 and the testing window will assess updated standards; presenters cautioned that tests are longer and standards are deeper, which may affect proficiency and comparability with prior years. The report also noted changes in alternate assessment participation: approximately 10 percent of students previously on alternate instruction were returned to standards‑based instruction after updated state criteria.
Instruction staff described requirements under the Virginia Literacy Act, including mandated reading plans for any student not at reading proficiency and the need to align those plans with specially designed instruction. Presenters said the majority of literacy plans and IEPs align, though a minority (13 percent in their review) reflected nonalignment largely because the student's primary disability did not center on reading. Staff said alignment enables interventions to complement rather than duplicate special‑education services.
Presenters reviewed kindergarten readiness and K–8 predictive assessments, noting substantial growth at early grades and slower, harder‑to‑move gaps in upper elementary and middle grades. They reported that middle‑school changes to intervention schedules gave stronger alignment between tier‑1 instruction and intervention services. The district also highlighted localized improvements at Hanley: predictive pass rates for algebra appeared to improve under a semester schedule, and biology outcomes for ninth graders improved after moving some students through environmental science first.
Board members asked whether midyear predictive measures represented students’ current ability to pass the full SOL (staff said the measures represent what students could pass now on the content covered to date), and whether increased assessment frequency risked overtesting. Several board members expressed concern about assessment burden; staff said most probes are brief and are intended to guide interventions, and they provided an assessment calendar on request.
Ending: staff said half‑year screeners and regular progress monitoring are central to the MTSS problem‑solving process and that continued alignment between special education and intervention teams remains a top priority.
