Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Village Center Redev topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants lay out village‑center mixed‑use plan; TID creation and zoning work set for late March
Summary
Consultants presented a draft mixed‑use master plan for the Mequon‑Pilgrim village center, emphasizing phased multifamily followed by commercial, a proposed TID boundary and next steps including zoning district drafting and a March 31 review. No commission action was requested; public commenters raised school and traffic concerns.
Consultants working with the Village of Germantown presented detailed concept plans and a timeline for a mixed‑use Village Center redevelopment centered on the Mequon and Pilgrim Road intersection during the Plan Commission’s March 10 meeting.
Bailey Copeland (Copeland Associates) and Eric Maine (Rinca) described the plan as a phased, catalytic redevelopment on roughly 25+ acres that would start with multifamily housing to create the population base for later retail and restaurant uses. They cited a market study that reported very low area vacancy rates (Germantown 2.5%, Mequon 1.1%, Menomonee Falls 4.6%, Cedarburg 2.3%) and a projected need for more than 1,000 multifamily units in the region over five years. Copeland said the village has controlled three properties in the opportunity area and the project team is pursuing a proposed Tax Incremental District (TID 10) to assist financing.
The consultants showed renderings of a pedestrian‑oriented market street, staged parking and underground parking for multifamily buildings, and a “market plots” public gathering area that can close for events. Eric Maine described an urban design strategy with lower‑rise buildings along Mequon and Pilgrim and taller residential buildings (up to five stories) set deeper into the site to limit street impact. Sam Schultz (Von Briesen & Roper) summarized draft zoning approaches: a new Village Center zoning district supported by a site‑specific plan‑development overlay that would set form‑based standards for building placement, transparency, entrances, and parking credits for shared lots.
Retzlaff emphasized the process and schedule: a joint review board meeting and Planning Commission public hearing on the proposed TID tentatively set for March 31, a Village Board TID action April 21, and a zoning district draft back before the Planning Commission March 31 with further hearings and adoption steps into April. The team also reported an RFQ process that drew 14 qualified developer responses; the next step would be an RFP once zoning and project scope are clear.
Several commissioners and speakers pressed for additional information on school impacts, traffic and timing. Russ, who identified himself as school board president, said the district is finishing a facilities study (presentation scheduled March 17) and an enrollment study to be completed in April and asked that the village consider those results before approvals. Other residents asked for more detailed traffic analysis and for the village to be clear about parking and the mix of retail versus residential.
No formal action or zoning adoption occurred; the presentation was informational and staff said more detailed zoning text and the TID project plan will be presented for public hearing and recommendation at future meetings.
