Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Weber County considers changes to subdivision completion guarantees; staff to vet letters of credit and escrow services
Summary
Commissioners discussed revising the county subdivision ordinance's completion-guarantee rules to address a possible mismatch with state code, weighed cash escrows, letters of credit, surety bonds and deed liens, and agreed to allow an exception for a current applicant while staff seeks escrow-company options and drafting language.
The Weber County Commission discussed proposed amendments to the county's subdivision ordinance to clarify completion-guarantee options and reduce the county's financial risk, directing staff to consult escrow firms and lending institutions and to return with recommended ordinance language.
County staff said the present ordinance allows cash escrows and, for projects over $1 million, letters of credit. Staff and the county attorney reported a potential compliance question with state code, which requires jurisdictions to provide two completion-guarantee forms; county attorneys have warned that offering only one practical option on smaller projects could leave the county legally exposed if challenged. Staff described outreach to other jurisdictions and found most prefer cash escrows and letters of credit, with some jurisdictions accepting letters of credit for projects as small as about $300,000.
County planning and finance staff raised administrative and legal concerns. Gary Myers said many jurisdictions prefer cash escrows and letters of credit, but letters of credit require active tracking because they commonly expire after one to two years. "You have to watch to pay attention to when that letter of credit expires," he said, adding that jurisdictions should set reminders in their project-tracking systems. Staff reported the county currently holds about $6.8 million in escrows, roughly $3.4 million of which is more than two years old, and warned older escrows can create enforcement and accounting burdens.
Speakers outlined three principal options discussed in the session: keep cash escrows as the default, accept letters of credit above a defined dollar threshold (participants floated $300,000 to $500,000), or accept deeds/liens or surety bonds in limited circumstances. Several participants cautioned against taking title to lots as a routine remedy after developer default, noting logistical and financial complications when other creditors have prior claims. Commissioners discussed the 2008 bank failures as a cautionary example for letters of credit held at financial institutions that later failed.
Operational safeguards were proposed: require letters of credit on a county-approved form, permit only county-approved financial institutions or escrow companies to hold completion guarantees, program the county's tracking system (Frontier) to send automated reminders three to six months before expiration, and include language that triggers bank notification and county action if a letter of credit will expire.
Commissioners agreed to a near-term administrative step: grant one exception to allow a current developer's request for a letter of credit while staff works with the county attorney to draft ordinance changes and to solicit escrow companies and banks for workable standard documents. County staff (Rick and Gary) were asked to work with the county attorney (Cortland) and to report back with recommended language and potential escrow providers.
Next steps: staff will solicit escrow firms and banks, draft sample letter-of-credit language and escrow-instruction templates for treasurer and attorney approval, and return to the commission with a recommended ordinance amendment and operational procedures for tracking and enforcement.
