Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Government Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances update to flood-control district statutes allowing flexible meeting locations and compensation rules
Summary
House Bill 161 would modernize statutes governing flood-control districts by allowing offices outside district boundaries, removing a monthly meeting requirement, aligning procurement with current law and allowing districts to set board compensation similar to irrigation districts. The committee sent the bill to the floor with a due-pass vote.
Representative John Vander Waata presented House Bill 161, which updates statutes governing flood-control districts. Vander Waata told the committee the bill allows a district office to be located outside its geographic boundary when necessary, removes the requirement that the board meet monthly (permitting meetings as needed so long as notices are posted), requires compliance with current procurement laws, and permits districts to set board-member compensation consistent with irrigation districts.
Dan Steenson, an attorney with Sawtooth Law who represents Flood Control District 10, told the committee flood-control districts are taxing districts whose revenues come from the land base within their boundaries. He testified to clarify the districts' funding source when the question arose during discussion.
Senator Taylor moved to send House Bill 161 to the Senate floor with a due-pass recommendation; Senator Cook seconded. The committee voted in favor and the motion carried.
The bill's changes are procedural and administrative in nature: office-location flexibility, meeting-frequency changes subject to open-meeting posting requirements, procurement compliance, and authorization for districts to set compensation. No fiscal note or detailed funding change was presented during the hearing; the committee did not record amendments at the time it advanced the bill.
