Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Estate Property Division topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parties in estate dispute reach agreement; judge approves appointment of master, surveyor and joint real-estate agents; temporary restraining order stays in eff
Summary
Parties in Bradford Boysen v. Weeden Boysen reached an agreed plan to divide property; the court approved a master and surveyor appointment, designated joint real-estate agents, and left an earlier temporary planning/restraining order in place.
Get email alerts on the Estate Property Division topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parties in the estate case Bradford Boysen v. Weeden Boysen told the court they had reached an agreement on dividing property, and the judge approved an agreed order appointing a master and surveyor and leaving an earlier temporary restraining/planning order in effect.
"Your honor, regarding the restraining order agreement scribe this time, in light of the agreement that we have, we are agreeable to, appoint miss Salinas to 1 Salinas that is kind of a master in this. She's already been a mediator," an attorney (identified in the transcript as Attorney 3) told the court as parties described the settlement. Attorney 3 also said the parties had agreed to select Jeff Chandler for surveying work and to have Amanda Bell serve jointly as a real-estate agent.
The attorney described several practical terms the parties agreed on: rent to be accounted for by Ms. Pulley, limited access rights for one party to sit on the front porch but not enter the house, and arrangements for recovery of personal property stored in a locked structure. "We've also had our own respective real estate agent with the adapting, having him being Amanda Bell. We've agreed to let them, call and act jointly together to come forward and provide the services that need to happen in regards to that," the attorney said. The attorney said the master would need to file for a new appraiser.
Judge David D. Wolfe said he would approve the parties' agreement and the order. "Well, then we will approve your grama. And, are you preparing the order? Yeah. And I'll approve your agreement," the judge said, later confirming the previously entered temporary planning order "will remain in full force in effect."
The transcript indicates the parties also reached a quick agreement in a separate civil matter, Noah Mayo v. Claire Lane, which counsel discussed off the bench; the court returned to the bench and approved that agreement as well. The transcript contains no filed order text, dollar amounts, or the full legal descriptions of the property; names for some participants (for example, "Miss Salinas") appear without given first names in the excerpt. The judge directed counsel to prepare the agreed order for filing.

