Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Anti Commandeering Natural Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves substitute declaring federal directives on state natural resources nonbinding
Summary
A committee substitute for Senate Bill 271 that declares federal directives commandeering the state’s natural resources would be challenged by West Virginia’s attorney general and gives immunity to state employees who refuse to comply; the committee agreed to the substitute and will report it to the full Senate.
A committee substitute for Senate Bill 271 that declares the federal government lacks authority to "commandeer" West Virginia natural resources and directs the attorney general to challenge federal actions moved forward without amendment.
Counsel told the committee the substitute is structured similarly to earlier anti‑commandeering legislation the Legislature passed and was modeled on that framework but applied to natural resources rather than firearms. The substitute would state the Legislature's findings that the federal government should not take over the state's natural resources and would authorize and direct the attorney general to challenge the constitutionality of any federal declaration the state deems to constitute commandeering. The substitute also would provide that a state or political‑subdivision officer, employee or agent who refuses to comply with a federal directive the state views as commandeering would not be prosecuted and would be immune from job loss for that refusal.
Why it matters: supporters framed the measure as a preemptive assertion of state authority over natural resources and a mechanism to trigger legal challenges to federal actions the Legislature deems intrusive; the committee did not record extended witness testimony or public‑comment debate on the substitute in the transcript.
Committee action
The committee agreed to the substitute by voice vote and voted to report the committee substitute for Senate Bill 271 to the full Senate with a recommendation for passage; under the bill's original double committee reference the substitute was to be referred first to the Judiciary Committee. The chair declared the motion adopted by voice vote.
What was discussed
Counsel summarized the substance and intent of the substitute on the record and answered questions from senators. No amendments were offered during the hearing, and the committee adopted the substitute and ordered it reported to the full Senate with the additional referral to Judiciary as required by original reference.
