Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fiscal Court Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Madison County Fiscal Court actions on Feb. 11, 2025
Summary
The fiscal court approved minutes and several resolutions and administrative items including two ASAP grant applicant-agent resolutions, personnel changes and payment of claims; roll-call votes recorded unanimous approval on each item.
Get email alerts on the Fiscal Court Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At its Feb. 11 meeting, the Madison County Fiscal Court recorded roll-call approvals for a set of routine and grant-related items.
Minutes: The court approved the Jan. 28 fiscal court meeting minutes by motion and roll call (listed members voted yes).
Resolution 2025‑008: The court unanimously approved Resolution 2025‑008 confirming the Madison County Fiscal Court to serve as applicant agent for the FY‑26 ASAP harm reduction grant and authorizing the judge executive or designee to execute the application on behalf of the county. The resolution text presented the ASAP board’s request and stated the fiscal court found it in the public interest to continue harm‑reduction education and awareness.
Resolution 2025‑009: The court unanimously approved Resolution 2025‑009 authorizing the fiscal court to serve as applicant agent for the FY‑26 general ASAP grant (Madison County ASAP funding request limited to $20,000) and authorizing the judge executive to sign assurances and applications; the resolution notes compliance with applicable federal and state laws and cited civil-rights and rehabilitation-act assurances in the text.
Personnel actions: The court approved personnel-status changes included in the meeting packet by motion and roll call.
Claims and transfers: The court approved payment of claims and transfers by motion and roll call.
Adjournment: The court approved adjournment by motion and roll call.
Roll-call format: For each of the roll calls recorded in the transcript, individual fiscal court members responded with affirmative votes when asked; no recorded 'no' or 'abstain' votes appear in the transcript for the items noted.

