Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Workforce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill clarifying supervising-clinician definition for prescribing psychologists amid scope concerns
Summary
A Senate committee advanced a bill that would update the definition of “independently licensed prescribing clinician” to include prescribing psychologists for certain practicums. Supporters called it cleanup; some members and a constituent warned it would expand who may supervise medically focused practicums without additional medical training.
A bill to revise the definition of “independently licensed prescribing clinician” so it explicitly includes prescribing psychologists was advanced by the committee after debate about training, supervision and patient safety.
Sponsor presentation: the sponsor described the bill as an update to the definition portion of existing law so that prescribing psychologists — a group whose scope expanded in recent years — are explicitly included for supervisory roles in certain practicums. The sponsor characterized the change as a technical cleanup to reflect existing practice since 2024.
Concerns from committee members and a constituent: Several senators and a constituent who supervises prescribing psychologists said the change would do more than housekeeping. They said the bill would add prescribing psychologists to the list of clinicians eligible to supervise the 80‑hour medically supervised practicum and the 400‑hour pharmacotherapy practicum. Critics warned that those practicums include training in physical evaluation and management of medically ill patients, and that prescribing psychologists may lack the medical training (for example, history-and-physical skills) needed to teach those competencies.
The sponsor and other supporters responded that prescribing psychologists operate in collaboration with primary care providers and were never expected to manage primary medical conditions; the bill would enable continuity of existing supervisory arrangements and reflect statutory intent. The sponsor also said the original omission should have been corrected in the prior bill and that the current language restores the intended definition.
After discussion the committee adopted a do-pass recommendation. The transcript records a roll-call-style sequence of voice votes with named senators; the motion passed (several yes votes were recorded and at least one no). The committee did not record additional statutory amendments in the hearing transcript.
What the bill does not resolve: The bill changes statutory definitions; it does not itself create new licensing or training requirements for prescribing psychologists, nor does it spell out the minimum clinical credentials a supervisor must possess. Members urged follow-up work to ensure supervisors have appropriate medical training where practicums require assessment of medically ill patients.
Provenance: Sponsor presentation and committee debate appear in the transcript from the bill’s introduction through the do-pass motion.
