Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision Waiver Connectivity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission denies five subdivision-waiver requests after debate over connectivity and proposed All Abilities Park

2529809 ยท March 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to deny five subdivision-waiver requests for the Deque and Mulkey preliminary plat, citing connectivity and code intent; the decision followed a lengthy public comment period in which residents and disability-advocacy supporters debated whether a proposed "All Abilities" park should influence the waiver outcome.

The Pflugerville Planning and Zoning Commission on Wednesday denied five subdivision-waiver requests for the Deque and Mulkey preliminary plan, rejecting proposals that would have reduced required street extensions and mid-block 15-foot pedestrian pass-throughs across a roughly 85-acre development site.

City staff described the five requests as (1) eliminating the requirement to extend a stubbed street (Trinity Settlement Lane) and (2โ€“5) four requests to remove or relocate 15-foot pedestrian pass-through easements required where blocks exceed 1,000 feet. Staff recommended denial, saying the waivers would undermine the city's connectivity goals and the Unified Development Code (UDC) intent.

"Connectivity to roadway, trail, bike, and pedestrian systems is critical for the Pflugerville transportation master plan and development code," City staff said during the presentation. The staff report noted the UDC allows waivers only if literal enforcement is physically unobtainable, not reasonably applicable, or would create an undesirable result; staff concluded the applicant had not shown the required evidence.

The applicant, represented by Amanda Swore of Turner Group, argued the waivers would preserve proportionality and payoffs to the city: she said the developer has submitted a rough-proportionality request and has engaged neighbors. "We have made the commitment... we would be putting in over a 5 acre play for All Abilities Park," Swore said. She also said the applicant had gathered letters of support (she estimated about 24) and asked the commission to consider consistency with other developments.

Residents near the proposed location opposed the road extensions and said opening stubs would increase cut-through traffic on existing neighborhood streets. Daniel Brown, a resident and Pflugerville ISD affiliate, urged the commission to consider the park opportunity but said flexibility on cross paths might be possible. Jerry Haskins, who lives on Boone Valley, said existing speeding and cut-through traffic are problems and objected to additional stub connections.

Supporters of an All Abilities Park also spoke. Amy Wiesenhaider, an adaptive physical education teacher with Pflugerville ISD, and Paula Dean, a special education teacher and former City of Round Rock adaptive-activities coordinator, urged support for locating an accessible play area in the development. Frank Fuentes, chairman of the U.S. Hispanic Contractors Association, urged commissioners to interpret the ordinance's spirit and consider the park's community benefit.

Commissioners pressed staff and the applicant on whether the park commitment was legally binding; staff clarified the developer had paid a parkland fee-in-lieu on the preliminary plan process step (staff described the fee-in-lieu process and said fee payment occurs later in the development sequence) and that the city has a 2020 bond allocation for a Play For All Abilities destination park in the amount of $1,600,000.00. Staff said the waivers do not have to be tied to a park commitment.

After extended discussion, a commissioner moved to deny all five waivers; the commission voted to deny them unanimously (no recorded no votes were announced). Staff reiterated that denying the waivers does not prevent a Play For All Abilities park from being proposed on the site through the regular parkland-dedication or amendment process.

Why it matters: The decision preserves the city's connectivity and multimodal standards for a large multifamily-area preliminary plat and leaves the developer to follow the UDC street- and pedestrian-connectivity requirements or return with a revised plan and supporting evidence if it seeks waivers again.

Outcome: Motion to deny all five subdivision-waiver requests โ€” adopted.