Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Seed Industry topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Idaho seed industry tells Senate Agriculture Committee it accounts for $800 million statewide

2526860 · March 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Industry representatives told the Senate Agriculture Committee that Idaho is a global seed-production region, provided new economic-impact figures, and outlined threats including loss of farmland, pesticide label cancellations, water uncertainty and an aging farmer population.

At a meeting of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Roger Batt, executive director of the Idaho Eastern Oregon Seed Association, told committee members that the state’s seed industry generates about $800 million in direct economic activity and roughly $1.5 billion when multipliers are included.

The industry’s economic weight and its contribution to food security make Idaho “one of six major global seed production regions,” Batt said, noting large production in the Treasure Valley, Magic Valley and Eastern Idaho. He told senators Idaho produces about 65% of the world’s sweet corn seed from Canyon County and is the U.S. leader in carrot, onion, dry bean and popcorn seed production.

Batt said the association’s internal 16-month study found $800 million in statewide economic impact, with approximately $500 million in Southwest Idaho (Treasure Valley), $200 million in Eastern/Magic Valley and $100 million in North Idaho. "Seed is the cornerstone of agriculture," Batt said. "Whoever controls the seed controls the food supply." He added most commercially produced seed varieties in Idaho are naturally bred, not genetically engineered.

Committee members pressed for technical details and clarified production facts. Melody Mayberry, introduced as a seed-industry specialist, said carrot seed yields average about 50 kilos per acre. Batt described typical planting and harvest windows—planting in April–May in the Treasure Valley and harvest from late summer into fall depending on crop. He said alfalfa seed acreage has fallen from about 32,000 acres historically to roughly 6,000 acres today because of oversupply and reduced contracts.

Speakers identified four principal threats to the industry: the loss of farmland to development, the loss or restriction of pesticide labels (including the prior EPA removal of chlorpyrifos, which industry speakers said reduced available options for managing pest pressure), certainty of water supplies and a shortage of younger farmers. Batt said irrigation practices unique to Idaho—furrow, flood or drip diversion from reservoirs—help make the state suited to seed production and that some crops perform poorly under sprinkler irrigation because of disease risk.

Batt described the seed-production footprint in Canyon County from the industry’s database: 3,382 fields sampled, fewer than 1,635 fields under 5 acres, 491 fields of 5–10 acres and only 28 fields over 40 acres in that sample. He also described the industry’s product chain: research and development, foundation seed and production contracts with growers, manufacturing and export, and local vendors supplying equipment and inputs.

Batt and the committee exchanged questions about regulatory and federal engagement; he suggested state partners such as the Idaho State Department of Agriculture work with federal agencies on pesticide labeling and urged legislative attention to water and farmland preservation to sustain seed production.

The committee received small vials of sample seed from the association; Batt noted the blue-coated seed was sugar beet seed coated to protect against soil-borne disease.

Committee members thanked the presenters and reserved follow-up questions for staff and state agencies.

Ending: The committee had no formal action on the presentation itself; members signaled interest in further information and possible follow-up with state partners on pesticide labels and water certainty.