Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Corrections Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NH Corrections officials warn budget shows low overtime but rely on hiring gains and vacancy savings
Summary
New Hampshire corrections officials told the House Finance Committee that a brighter budget presentation depends on federal ARPA receipts that replaced some general‑fund spending and on plans to reduce expensive overtime by filling vacancies.
Concord — New Hampshire Department of Corrections officials told the House Finance Committee on March 1 that the department’s fiscal outlook appears improved on paper but depends heavily on continued recruitment and use of vacancy savings to cut overtime.
Commissioner Helen Hanks and Director of Administration Lisa Stone said a sizeable portion of the healthier appearance in the current budget came because the state recognized federal ARPA receipts previously applied to recruitment and retention incentives. Hanks said those ARPA dollars were used in fiscal 2023 and recorded as revenue in 2024, “so if you hadn’t had the federal funds and still did that work, it would have been general funds.”
Why it matters: committee members pressed that the budget’s sharp reduction in overtime lines could be optimistic. Overtime pay is more expensive than regular wages because of doubled hourly rates and continuing benefits, and the department has historically relied on forced overtime when vacancies rose. If recruitment or retention falters, the department may need supplemental appropriations.
Hanks said recruitment is trending in the right direction: law‑enforcement ranks fell from a 51% vacancy rate in January 2023 to about 42% in December 2024, and 28 new corrections officers are scheduled for the next academy. Stone said the department has 33 hires in hand from a recent hiring graphic and is still onboarding more.
Lawmakers asked for more detail on the cost dynamics. Rep. McGuire pressed staff on how many vacant positions the department must deliberately leave open to cover overtime in a typical year; Hanks replied the department’s goal is to fill positions so it won’t have to “lean in” on overtime, and if unforeseen events occur (retirements or recruitment slowdowns) the department will request additional appropriations.
On staffing and population: Hanks said inmates in state custody number roughly 1,970 and about 4,000 are supervised in the community under probation and parole; combined, the department oversees close to 6,000 people. She said the department’s recidivism rate has declined by 8 percentage points over seven years, which the department estimates saved the state about $14 million over that period. Hanks also noted about 40% of people in facilities are there for parole violations.
Costs and break‑even: committee members pressed the department on whether hiring a new corrections officer becomes cheaper than paying overtime and how long it takes to break even if a department replaces overtime with a new hire. Stone said roughly 11 months is required to break even, depending on benefits (family coverage takes longer to recoup). Committee members also noted that the department’s $2‑per‑day estimate for supervision cost was based on older annual reports and asked staff to return with updated unit‑cost figures and how the FY26 budget parses incarceration versus community supervision costs.
What’s next: officials requested and expect to receive footnoted budget authority allowing them to move vacancy savings to pay for newly filled positions and to show an overtime safety net in case of unforecasted personnel changes. They also said they will come to fiscal committees if the vacancy‑funding strategy proves insufficient.
