Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Presidential Libraries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Intergovernmental Affairs panel approves bill to preempt local land-use rules for presidential libraries
Summary
The House subcommittee voted to report favorably on HB 69 (sponsored as a local variant referenced as 45/47), a bill that preempts local land-use and zoning authority for the siting and construction of presidential libraries in Florida. The measure passed after an amendment clarifying the scope of preemption; the final vote was 13-2.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Presidential Libraries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Andrade explained HB 69 to the Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee as a measure that would place land-use and zoning decisions for presidential libraries under state control to avoid “onerous or confusing” local permitting processes. He told the committee the bill’s purpose is to “make sure that the planning, design, and construction process for a presidential library here in the state is as smooth as possible.”
The committee adopted amendment barcode 559435, which Representative Andrade said “clarifies what precisely is preempted to the state related to local government and zoning authority.” Representative Harris questioned the need for state preemption given federal involvement in presidential libraries and asked whether state action would reduce neighbors’ ability to challenge a federal project. Brock Sutter (speaking during explanation) responded that ownership status does not always remove the need for local development orders and that local permitting processes vary by jurisdiction; the sponsor said the bill is intended to reduce process hurdles in the event a presidential library is proposed in Florida.
There was limited debate. Representative Harris said she had concerns about increasing state authority over local land-use matters and asked for further discussion on implementation; she did not register a vote in favor. After the amendment and final remarks by the sponsor, the committee recorded the bill as reported favorably by a roll call of 13 yeas and 2 nays.
Votes at a glance: HB 69 (as amended) — reported favorably, 13 yeas, 2 nays.
The committee recorded the vote after closing debate and adoption of the amendment; the bill proceeds from the subcommittee with the committee’s favorable recommendation.
