Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Corrections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Corrections subcommittee seeks detailed report on community jail costs, utilization and potential closures

2526273 · March 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Finance Budget Subcommittee requested two detailed reports from the Department of Corrections by Dec. 20, 2025, examining potential savings from closing institutions and a facility-level accounting of fixed and marginal costs and utilization for community jails.

The House Finance Budget Subcommittee forwarded intent language asking the Department of Corrections to provide detailed analysis of community jail costs and the fiscal effects of potential closures, subcommittee staff told the full committee on March 7.

Hunter Meacham, staff to Representative Hannon, presented the DOC closeout narrative and said the subcommittee adopted an amendment that increased funding by $567,500 in the population management appropriation to partially address shortfalls for community jails. The subcommittee also forwarded two pieces of intent language directing the Department of Corrections to submit reports to the co-chairs of the finance committees and the Legislative Finance Division by Dec. 20, 2025: (1) a report examining which institutions would produce the most cost savings if closed and the estimated transition and capital costs; and (2) a facility-level report listing total annual operating cost, fixed and marginal costs, average utilization for state and local inmates and a proposed allocation formula that fully funds fixed costs and marginal costs for state inmates.

Fiscal analyst Connor Bill explained that “marginal cost” refers to the incremental cost associated with each additional person on state charges versus the fixed cost of operating the facility; the intention is to better separate payments for state inmates from costs borne locally.

Why it matters: Members said the department’s earlier responses to similar questions were insufficient and that better, more detailed analysis is necessary to evaluate whether institutional changes could reduce long‑term costs. Representative Hannon said the subcommittee would reprise the request because the previous year’s answer was not satisfactory.

Procedural note: The subcommittee adopted its DOC closeout report and forwarded the narrative and budget action report to the full Finance Committee.