Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members refer McKens fencing options to committee; lighting status discussed
Summary
The governing body voted to refer fencing options — including three cost-level designs and gates offered by Officer Peel — to a committee for more information; the transcript indicates lighting at McKens was discussed but does not record a clear final approval for lighting.
Members voted to refer fencing options for McKens to a committee for additional information and design work, and discussed lighting at the site.
A member moved to accept a recommendation to move forward on lighting at McKens but then said the matter should not include gating. Another member clarified they wanted to “refer that back to a committee to bring us back more information regarding the gates offered by, Officer Peel.” The motion to refer fencing and gating options to a committee was seconded and carried by voice/raising of hands.
Board Member 4 summarized available fencing options as “3 options with different levels of cost that we can review, that architect would design, and then we could review it and then submit it for bids.” The transcript records that the architect would produce designs and that any selected option would be submitted for bidding; no contract awards, bid amounts, or timelines were recorded in the transcript.
One speaker later said, “we took care of the lighting and fencing with that. That. I think we did the lighting and open because that was not an executive session item,” but the record does not identify a formal, separate vote authorizing specific lighting work or show budget or contract details tied to lighting.
The motion to refer fencing/gates back to committee passed; the transcript records the outcome as carried but does not provide a roll-call or numeric vote tally.
