Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Communications Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves 5-year license for federal agency to install radio transmission equipment on city property; speakers ask for more transparency
Summary
The Virginia Beach City Council voted 9-0 to grant a five-year license to a federal agency to install and operate radio transmission equipment on city property at 4535 Commerce Street, despite public calls for more transparency about the agency and safeguards for residents’ communications.
The Virginia Beach City Council on a 9-0 vote approved an ordinance to award a license for a portion of city-owned property at 4535 Commerce Street to an identified federal agency for a five-year term to install and operate radio transmission equipment.
Two residents raised questions during the public comment period about the lack of public detail in the ordinance. Joe Johnson said he was concerned the ordinance refers only to an unnamed “federal agency” and asked five questions including the purpose of the agency’s presence, whether the city is charging rent, safeguards to prevent access to private communications and personal data, how the license benefits residents, and whether there are comparable past projects.
"I should not, nor should the citizens of Virginia Beach accept a blank check for government access with no questions asked," Johnson said. He asked the council to slow the process and provide answers before approving the license.
Melissa Lukasen said the absence of a named agency and the lack of explanation for why the space is being provided free of charge raised concerns about surveillance and government secrecy. "If this is truly in the public's best interest, prove it. Name the agency, explain the purpose, and while you're at it, start charging rent," she said.
During council discussion Council Member Henley asked why the agency was not identified. A city official responded that it is a federal law enforcement agency and that security concerns limit what can be disclosed, adding that the agency would use the city's communications tower to route law enforcement communications. Council Member Schulman said it is common for the federal government not to pay rent or license charges when using such infrastructure, and asked whether additional public information (consistent with security constraints) could be provided to reassure residents.
The ordinance passed 9-0. The transcript does not record the ordinance number or further operational details such as technical specifications, the precise portion of the site to be used, or any negotiated compensation; those items were not specified in the public record provided.
