Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Procedure Quorum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeland City pauses briefly as unanimous vote required for applicants
Summary
A Lakeland City meeting noted a quorum of five was present but that votes on applicants require unanimity; staff suggested waiting briefly for an additional member, identified as Mr. Bronner.
A staff member said the Lakeland City body had a quorum with five members present but would require a unanimous vote to approve any applicant, and suggested briefly waiting to see if an additional member—identified as Mr. Bronner—would arrive.
The clarification matter-of-factly framed a procedural choice: "We may just wanna give it a minute or so if mister Bronner's coming as well just so we have because right now we have 5, we have a quorum. However, we would require a unanimous vote for any applicant," the staff member said. The staff member added that if six members were present, they would prefer unanimity for such votes.
The transcript contains only that procedural exchange; it does not record any motion, vote, or whether the meeting ultimately delayed to wait for Mr. Bronner. As recorded, no formal action on any applicant took place during the quoted exchange.
The exchange indicates a limit on the body's decision rule for applicants (unanimous approval) and shows staff awareness that the presence or absence of one member could affect whether the meeting proceeds immediately or pauses for a potential arrival. The transcript does not specify the type of applicant under consideration, whether the unanimous rule is a standing policy or a temporary requirement, nor does it identify the governing body by a formal board or commission title beyond "Lakeland City."
