Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners receive training on Oregon land‑use process, statewide goals, quasi‑judicial rules and 150‑day timeline
Summary
Planning staff delivered a training summarizing Oregon land‑use law, DLCD’s role, decision types (ministerial, administrative, quasi‑judicial, legislative), ex parte rules, evidence standards, and the 150‑day statutory timeline for local land‑use actions. Commissioners scheduled an April review of the comprehensive plan.
Commissioners received a multi-part training from Stephanie Case and staff covering Oregon land‑use law, the state oversight role, decision types and hearing procedures, evidence standards, and statutory timelines for local land‑use actions.
Case explained state background and oversight: “DLCD is the Department of Land Conservation and Development,” and she described the 1973 land‑use law (Senate Bill 100) as the foundation for statewide planning goals. She said every city and county is required to have a comprehensive plan and that the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) provides comments and technical assistance on plan and code amendments.
The training summarized four decision types used in practice: ministerial (staff over‑the‑counter approvals), administrative (staff decisions with notice requirements), quasi‑judicial (the planning commission acts as an impartial tribunal applying existing law), and legislative (code or plan changes, which the commission recommends to county court). Staff emphasized ex parte disclosure and site‑visit reporting for quasi‑judicial hearings so all parties know what decision‑makers have been told and seen.
Case reiterated that the burden of proof rests with applicants: “The burden of proof is on the applicant, the proponent,” and explained standards for admissible evidence — documents, data, and testimony that a reasonable person would rely on — and the need for findings that explain why the commission accepted some evidence over contrary evidence. She also reviewed remedies and timelines: local governments must make final decisions on many land‑use applications within 150 days after an application is deemed complete (with a 30‑day period for staff to deem completeness and statutory procedures for suspending timelines if an application is incomplete).
Staff and commissioners discussed periodic review of the county comprehensive plan. Case and others agreed the comprehensive plan and code had not seen a full periodic review in several years and that a phased, commissioner‑led review would be useful. Commissioners set April 22 at 6:00 p.m. for a meeting to begin the comprehensive plan review; staff will circulate the county plan and the Oregon Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines in advance.
The training closed with a short quiz on key points and an agreement to return to specific topics in future sessions, including conflict-of-interest/ex‑parte rules, findings preparation, and standards of evidence for contested applications.
