Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Presenters note Lincoln County policy manual contains many relevant provisions but some policies appear dated; board urged to review regularly
Summary
At the March 6 work session presenters noted the district's policy manual addresses the evening's topics but many policies show 2011 adoption dates; they recommended a periodic review cycle and pointed to recent updates such as a public participation policy revised Nov. 28, 2023.
Legal counsel and the school boards association told Lincoln County board members on March 6 that the district's policy manual contains provisions relevant to governance, ethics, volunteers and facility use but that several policies in the packet appeared to have older adoption dates and would benefit from scheduled review.
Howard Souffer and Jim Brown said they reviewed the district's manual and found many of the policies that address the session topics, but noted most of the printed policies they examined were dated "02/2011." Souffer pointed out that one policy — public participation at board meetings — showed a most recent revision date of Nov. 28, 2023, indicating the board has revised some policies but not all.
Presenters recommended putting policies on a rotation for periodic review (for example, every four years) so board members and new members can learn and confirm that policies match current statutes and state board rules. Brown said such a rotation helps keep policies aligned with legislative changes and reduces the risk that an outdated policy could lead to noncompliance.
Board members said they have undertaken policy revisions and held special meetings in recent years; presenters advised continuing that work, consulting Neola policy service or similar providers, and documenting revisions through the board process (public comment and formal adoption) when changes are needed.
The presenters linked policy review to other recommendations: clear agendas, consistent posting procedures, and reliance on superintendent communications. They stressed that boards must follow the policies they adopt until they are lawfully changed.
