Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Votes Consent topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Layton City Council approves consent agenda including seized funds appropriation, RAMP intent and commission appointments
Summary
At its March meeting the Layton City Council approved the full consent agenda in a single motion, including resolutions on seized funds, commission appointments, the RAM tax intent, an SRS agreement extension, an easement vacation and a plat amendment.
At its March meeting the Layton City Council approved the full consent agenda in a single motion. Items approved on the consent agenda included resolutions and planning items described below. The council recorded a unanimous voice vote on the motion to adopt the consent agenda.
Votes at a glance (consent items)
• Resolution 25‑06: Approve appropriation of seized funds from the Davis Metro Narcotic Strike Force ($13,606.08). Staff said the total came from several past seizure incidents and follow‑up audit work; monies will be appropriated in accordance with forfeiture rules. Outcome: approved.
• Resolution 25‑07: Appoint and reappoint members to the Parks and Recreation Commission (appointments and reappointments listed in staff report). Outcome: approved.
• Resolution 25‑09 (consent item C): Authorize staff to forward Layton City’s intent to the Davis County Commission to include an opinion question on the RAM (RAMP) tax reapproval on the ballot, amended in council to remove the word 'operations' to conform with city ordinance. Outcome: approved.
• Resolution 25‑08: Amend and extend the city’s agreement with SRS (Sustainable Real Estate Solutions) for CPACE administration for five years. Outcome: approved.
• Item E (plat/easement action): Approve public utility/drainage easement vacation to allow a lot‑line adjustment between 1664 East and 1658 East Gordon Avenue, subject to establishment of new easements as shown. Outcome: approved.
• Item F (plat amendment): Approve Qmax Subdivision, First Amendment (lot split to create Lot 4 and Lot 5) following a unanimous planning commission recommendation and subject to standard staff requirements. Outcome: approved.
How the council acted: A council member moved approval of the full consent agenda; a second followed and the council voted in favor. Several consent items had been previewed and discussed in the work meeting; staff and council members gave brief verbal presentations on individual items before the vote. No public referendum or separate full council hearing was required for consent items at this meeting.
Recorded vote: motion to approve the consent agenda — unanimous voice vote in favor (no individual roll‑call tallies were read into the record).
