Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bus Cameras Bus Patrol topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent, police and vendor discuss camera system to catch drivers who pass stopped school buses
Summary
District and city staff described preliminary talks with a vendor, Bus Patrol, about installing cameras on buses to record drivers who illegally pass stopped buses; vendor projects the system could be financed by resulting ticket revenue, but officials said the city must first adopt enabling local acceptance of a state law.
Springfield Public Schools staff and city officials discussed preliminary plans to pilot a camera system on school buses that would identify vehicles that pass stopped buses and generate evidence for police citations.
Chief Pat Roach, who supervises district transportation, said the district and First Student (the bus operator) contacted the vendor Bus Patrol. "They install cameras on all sides of the bus. The cameras are automatically monitored. They, when the bus pulls into the bus yard, they get uploaded over Wi Fi. They get put up to on on the server that, bus patrol monitors. They use AI to go through the pictures to and then they have people review them and then they would send a file to the police department and then the police and, with high accuracy that these are the expectation of the plates and the cars and people who pass buses and that file will go to the police department for them to issue tickets," Roach said.
Roach said Bus Patrol quoted monthly fees of about $225–$275 per bus for roughly 273 buses — a district total the presentation estimated at roughly $737,000 per year — and the vendor told staff its expectation is that citation revenue would cover the cost. "They said the risk is all on them," Roach said at the meeting, adding that the vendor proposed deferring district payments if citation revenue lags expectations.
Committee members raised several concerns: whether revenue generated by tickets would be retained by the city while installation costs fell to the district; how citation revenue would be allocated; privacy protections for students (including compliance questions under FERPA); whether cameras would capture frontal images of motorists or students; and whether the city council must locally adopt the statewide law before the municipality can implement the program.
Officials said the state law (passed and signed) establishes guardrails, including language aimed at limiting frontal images of passing vehicles; the law also requires automatic deletion of non‑violation footage after 30 days unless it is needed for an issued citation. City legal staff and police would need to negotiate contracting and revenue arrangements: transportation staff recommended the police department hold any vendor contract and revenue flow because police issue the citations.
Next steps described at the meeting included an internal city/district discussion with the vendor and a report back to the school committee with additional details on contracting, data handling, projected revenues and privacy safeguards.
