Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pulaski Park Future topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Park board recommends converting fenced Pulaski Park tennis area to passive open space
Summary
After discussing noise, parking and past use, the board recommended removing the fence around the Pulaski Park tennis/tennis-court area and planting grass to create passive open space; staff and a commissioner will draft a letter to the mayor's office.
Get email alerts on the Pulaski Park Future topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fall River City Park Board of Commissioners discussed the fenced tennis-court area at Pulaski Park and recommended removing the fence and converting the paved area to grassed passive open space to reduce neighborhood nuisance and parking impacts.
Commissioners described the fenced, asphalted area as a recurring site of conflicts last summer when volleyball and other informal uses drew crowds and traffic into a tight residential area. One commissioner suggested removing the fence and planting grass; another proposed a dog-park conversion but members raised concerns about parking, noise and enforcement and noted that pickleball courts can trigger noise complaints in dense neighborhoods. The board emphasized that any change should avoid recreating the same nuisance conditions that led to the current secured status.
The board asked staff to prepare a recommendation letter for the mayor’s office. In the meeting record a commissioner and staff member Al agreed to draft and send the letter to what the minutes call the "Sixth Floor" (mayor’s office) summarizing the board’s preferred option: remove the fence, plant grass and designate the space for passive recreation. The board did not adopt a formal ordinance change at the meeting; the action is a recommendation to city leadership.
The parks staff noted costs and logistical steps (removing asphalt and repairing or replacing fence panels if needed) and said any work would include an assessment of access and parking impacts before implementation. Commissioners also discussed potential alternative uses, including a small dog park or keeping the fence and using the area for a low-impact amenity, but the prevailing recommendation was passive open space to reduce neighborhood conflicts.
The board asked staff to return updates after the mayor’s office receives the recommendation and after staff assesses estimated removal and landscaping costs.

