Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transient Lodging Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would exempt small fairground camping from Oregon transient lodging tax
Summary
A public hearing on House Bill 2171 heard testimony that small, short-stay camping at county fairgrounds imposes an administrative burden that exceeds the few dollars the state now collects; industry witnesses urged caution about carving away transient lodging tax revenue.
Oregon lawmakers held a public hearing Wednesday on House Bill 2171, which would exempt certain small camping sites at county fairgrounds from the state transient lodging tax (TLT).
Proponents said the exemption would remove an administrative burden that costs fairgrounds more to process than the tax yields.
Representative Anna Scharf (R–House District 23), the bill sponsor, told the committee the TLT, established in 2003 to fund the Oregon Tourism Commission program, is sensible in general but imposes disproportionate administrative work on county fairgrounds that are not lodging operators. She offered a Polk County example: the fairground charges $25 for a night’s RV parking, the 1.5% TLT on that charge is 31 cents, and Polk County Fairgrounds reportedly collected about $400 in TLT over one year; Scharf said the labor and routing of those pennies through county and state systems likely cost more than the receipts.
The bill would exempt county fairgrounds that meet both conditions: no more than 50 camping sites, and sites that provide electrical and water hookups but not direct sewer hookups (i.e., not full RV hookup sites). Representative Scharf said fairgrounds that operate full RV parks with water, sewer and power — and that exceed the 50-site threshold — would remain subject to the TLT; she cited Crook County Fairgrounds as an example of a facility that would still collect the tax because it operates 80 full RV sites.
Bill Perry of the Oregon Restaurant & Lodging Association said his organization sympathizes with the administrative concern but warned that members worry about incremental exemptions that could erode the TLT base over time. He told the committee he would follow up with the committee on reporting thresholds and other technical questions about when counties must remit small amounts to the state.
Committee members expressed bipartisan support for the bill’s basic intent as a “common-sense” solution for very small fairground operations. Several lawmakers said small fairs often net so little TLT revenue that the administrative burden outweighs any benefit.
No formal committee action or vote was recorded at the hearing; the item was heard and then the committee proceeded to additional fairground-related bills. Staff and witnesses said there remain technical questions for follow-up, including the minimum reporting threshold and exact reporting cadence for these collections.
The measure was presented as a narrow exemption, limited to small fairgrounds that do not operate as full-service RV parks.
