Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Quality Nutrients topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee advances bill to uncouple numeric nutrient criteria from variance authority in Montana water rules
Summary
Lawmakers voted to advance House Bill 664, which would change how nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) numeric criteria and variance authority interact in Montana’s water quality regulatory framework; supporters said the present rules have produced litigation and regulatory paralysis, while opponents warned about downstream impacts and costs.
Representative Mercer, sponsor of House Bill 664, told the committee the state’s numeric nutrient standards and the related variance authority created under prior rule‑making have produced litigation that has blocked the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) from issuing effective permits. “This bill is designed to say the 12a standard being uncoupled from a meaningful 12b variance authority never would have been approved,” Mercer said, arguing the current framework leaves permittees and communities in regulatory limbo.
Why it matters: supporters said the statute’s present coupling of numeric criteria and limited variance options has prevented DEQ from issuing enforceable permits and stalled infrastructure and water‑quality investments; opponents warned that removing deadlines and numeric anchors could reduce protections, shift costs to municipalities and ratepayers and fail to address nonpoint sources.
Representative Konauer, speaking from experience in the field, said DEQ needs workable authority to issue permits and that municipalities have been operating under old permits while the rules are litigated. Representative Edwards, a conservation nonprofit director, said the issue is complex and involves nonpoint sources and financial burdens for small communities; Edwards announced a reluctant “no” vote, urging more stakeholder work. Representative Minor argued the bill allows Montana to move forward from a broken regulatory morass; the committee voted to recommend the bill do pass, 70 ayes to 29 noes.
Ending: The measure will go to the House floor; sponsors said they expect further work and stakeholder negotiations in the Senate to balance science, feasibility and financial impacts for municipalities and nonpoint sources.
