Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mayfield Board hears finance briefing: district says about $3.7 million in federal aid equals roughly 3% of budget
Summary
District finance staff briefed the Mayfield Board of Education on Feb. 26 about the make-up and limited exposure of federal funding to the district — roughly $3.7 million, or about 3% of the total budget — and said most of those dollars are restricted allotments that flow through the state.
Mayfield School District finance staff briefed the Mayfield Board of Education on Feb. 26 about the district’s federal funding and the potential impact of federal budget changes.
The presenter said the district receives about $3.7 million in federal resources, which he described as roughly 3% of the district’s total budget. He told the board the largest single portion of those funds—about $1,400,000—supports what the presenter called “6 b” programs used to improve math and language-arts instruction and to help students needing special-education or intervention services. Other annual federal allotments cited included about $500,000 for career and technical education, about $655,000 that supports the school food-service reimbursement program, and about $620,000 for Title I services aimed at remediation and language-arts assistance for economically disadvantaged students attending buildings that receive Title I support.
The presenter emphasized that these are ongoing, restricted allotments that generally pass through the state. He said the district has spent its one-time federal stimulus funds and that the restriction and annual nature of the current allotments reduce—but do not eliminate—the risk from federal budget changes.
A board member asked whether the state could replace or otherwise adjust funding if the federal government stopped forwarding the allotments. The presenter replied that in that scenario the state could either supplement the funds from its own sources or relax some of the federal restrictions to provide flexibility, and that those outcomes would affect how services are delivered. No formal action followed the presentation.
Why it matters: the funds cited support core instructional and meal services for students identified as economically disadvantaged or in need of intervention. Changes to those dollars could require program adjustments or alternate local funding decisions.
Meeting context: the briefing was presented as part of the board’s business agenda and included a short question-and-answer exchange. The presenter framed the amounts as annual, restricted allotments and said the district’s exposure to federal reductions was limited because these are ongoing, not one-time, funds.
