Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals court hears ex-employee—s wrongful-termination claim against Shire, centered on whistleblowing and performance disputes

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Appeals Court reviewed an at-will employee—s wrongful-termination claim against Shire Pharmaceuticals on March 6, focusing on whether the record creates a triable issue that Pulido was fired for reporting regulatory compliance concerns about controlled substances.

The Massachusetts Appeals Court on March 6 heard argument in a civil employment appeal: Dr. Mitsin Pulido v. Shire Pharmaceuticals (A-4-P-172), a dispute where the former employee contends he was terminated in retaliation after he raised compliance concerns about controlled-substance tracking and refused to accept removal from a project.

John McCann, counsel for Dr. Pulido, told the panel Pulido was assigned to design a compliant, automated tracking system for controlled substances (Vyvanse, Adderall) and later discovered alleged regulatory noncompliance. McCann said Pulido took internal steps and raised concerns to Shire—s compliance officers and to the U.S. Attorney—s Office.…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans